01 · Immutable source audit

A valuable treatment check-in concept with unsafe delivery and incomplete dependencies.

This report preserves the installed v16.1 source exactly as reviewed: two cooperating workflows, structured treatment intake, conflicting cadence logic and a critical third-party data destination.

Source v16.1Reviewed Sep 18, 202631 nodes0 active channels
VOTEL SNAPSHOT AUDITLEGAL + HEALTHCARE

Treatment
Compliance

Installed agent1
Source workflows2
Source findings14
Open outputs5
Source statusREPAIR
01 · Executive verdict

Do not activate the source build as installed.

The split architecture is useful: one workflow launches and monitors calls while another collects structured treatment updates. The implementation is not portable or privacy-safe because treatment detail, a recording URL and an AI summary route to a hard-coded external address; cadence, retry, phone, sender, Spanish handoff and data-model dependencies are also incomplete.

Reusable

Core idea

Separate outbound orchestration from the answered conversation.

Critical

Data delivery

Sensitive detail leaves the account through an unsafe recipient.

Repair

Automation

The weekly promise and retry branches do not match the graph.

02 · Installed inventory

The working graph is much larger than the packaged manifest.

Treatment Compliance source inventory
AssetObserved stateVerified detail
Patient Treatment Follow-UpsInactive

GPT-5.4 Mini, Katie voice, en-US, zero live channels.

Weekly Client Calls16 nodes

Manual entry, outbound call, counter, waits, escalation and completion.

Answered Treatment Call15 nodes

Language route, conditional ten-question intake, notification, date update and hangup.

Packaged fields2 only

The graph depends on ten treatment answers plus phone, email, pipeline, tag and agent configuration.

03 · Workflow architecture

Two flows cooperate, but both contain broken assumptions.

Source orchestration workflow
The one-day retry emails and stops; the two-week path is the only route back to the call.
Source answered-call workflow
The English intake is detailed; the Spanish handoff is absent and both transfer outcomes are open.
04 · Defect register

Fourteen findings grouped by what must change.

IDsPriorityFinding
TC-001 / 012Critical

Hard-coded external recipient; no consent, minimization, retention or secure-delivery policy.

TC-002 / 003 / 011High

Manual first entry, conflicting weekly/biweekly copy and a one-day “call again” branch that never calls.

TC-004 / 005 / 006 / 007High

No outbound caller ID, empty pipeline/stage, missing Spanish agent and five emails without a sender.

TC-008 / 009 / 010High

Incomplete field package, completion-state race and open Spanish transfer outputs.

TC-013 / 014Medium

Hard-coded identity, duplicated prompt direction, open terminals and no safe path proof.

05 · Evidence boundary

Source truth was preserved before repair.

The agency source agent remains unchanged. A private source snapshot named [VOTEL SOURCE] Treatment Compliance Follow-Up | v16.1 | PRIVATE BASELINE contains one agent and two packaged custom fields. All corrections were made in a separate repair tenant.

Source audit complete.

Continue to the remediation report to see every correction and the approved replacement architecture.

Open remediation report →